Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen
This text of 512 U.S. 1288 (Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on [1289]*1289or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 U.S. 1288, 115 S. Ct. 42, 129 L. Ed. 2d 937, 63 U.S.L.W. 3255, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13510, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 5330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-wright-corp-v-schoonejongen-scotus-1994.