Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

512 U.S. 1288, 115 S. Ct. 42, 129 L. Ed. 2d 937, 63 U.S.L.W. 3255, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13510, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 5330
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedSeptember 26, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1935
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 512 U.S. 1288 (Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 512 U.S. 1288, 115 S. Ct. 42, 129 L. Ed. 2d 937, 63 U.S.L.W. 3255, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13510, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 5330 (1994).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on [1289]*1289or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Dretke
412 F.3d 582 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Lambert
351 F. Supp. 2d 1154 (D. Kansas, 2004)
United States v. Logan
241 F. Supp. 2d 1164 (D. Kansas, 2002)
United States v. Lutz
207 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (D. Kansas, 2002)
Rose v. Johnson
141 F. Supp. 2d 661 (S.D. Texas, 2001)
Lawton v. Johnson
Fifth Circuit, 2000
Rupert v. Johnson
79 F. Supp. 2d 680 (W.D. Texas, 1999)
Thompson v. Johnson
7 F. Supp. 2d 848 (S.D. Texas, 1998)
Cordova v. Johnson
993 F. Supp. 473 (W.D. Texas, 1998)
Williams v. Cain
125 F.3d 269 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Flores v. Johnson
957 F. Supp. 893 (W.D. Texas, 1997)
Adanandus v. Johnson
947 F. Supp. 1021 (W.D. Texas, 1996)
Boyle v. Johnson
93 F.3d 180 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Amos v. Scott
61 F.3d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Jacobs v. the Florida Bar
50 F.3d 901 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Jacobs v. Florida Bar
50 F.3d 901 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Alabama State Bar Ass'n v. R.W. Lynch Co.
655 So. 2d 982 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 U.S. 1288, 115 S. Ct. 42, 129 L. Ed. 2d 937, 63 U.S.L.W. 3255, 94 Daily Journal DAR 13510, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 5330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-wright-corp-v-schoonejongen-scotus-1994.