Curtiss v. Sprague
49 Cal. 301
This text of 49 Cal. 301 (Curtiss v. Sprague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Curtiss v. Sprague, 49 Cal. 301 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
The counter-claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, and, under the provisions of the Practice Act, the plaintiff must be considered to have pleaded the statute by way of replication to the counter-claim.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Francisco v. Francisco
191 P.2d 317 (Montana Supreme Court, 1947)
Jones v. Mortimer
170 P.2d 893 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.
47 P.2d 273 (California Supreme Court, 1935)
Kelley v. Hodge Transportation System
242 P. 76 (California Supreme Court, 1925)
Platner v. Vincent
229 P. 24 (California Supreme Court, 1924)
Pettengill v. Blackman
164 P. 358 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Foster v. Young
156 P. 476 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Pacific Improvement Co. v. Maxwell
146 P. 900 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Melander v. Western National Bank
132 P. 265 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Baker v. Baker
100 P. 892 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Peck v. Noee
97 P. 865 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Tracy v. Wheeler
107 N.W. 68 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)
Alspaugh v. Reid
55 P. 300 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1898)
Moore v. Copp
51 P. 630 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Sterling v. Smith
32 P. 320 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Williams v. Dennison
29 P. 946 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Grangers' Business Ass'n v. Clark
23 P. 1081 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Rankin v. Sisters of Mercy
22 P. 1134 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Janes v. Throckmorton
57 Cal. 368 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Colton Land & Water Co. v. Raynor
57 Cal. 588 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-v-sprague-cal-1874.