Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Curtis v. State

Curtis v. State

870 So. 2d 186, 2004 WL 360509
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2004·No. 2D03-2330·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

870 So.2d 186 (2004)

Franklin CURTIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-2330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2004.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 2004.

DAVIS, Judge.

Franklin Curtis challenges the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. While habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to address the claims raised by Curtis, they are cognizable in a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent from the trial court's analysis that it treated Curtis' claims as if they were raised in a postconviction motion. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm without discussion.

Affirmed.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. State, 870 So. 2d 186, 2004 WL 360509 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

870 So. 2d 186 (Curtis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clough v. State
136 So. 3d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Bruno v. State
46 So. 3d 74 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Valdez-Garcia v. State
965 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)