Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Curtis v. State

Curtis v. State

827 So. 2d 361, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14299, 2002 WL 31202136
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2002
DocketNo. 1D01-298
StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 361 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. State, 827 So. 2d 361, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14299, 2002 WL 31202136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Andrena M. Curtis, challenges her resentencing conducted by the trial court outside of her presence. We reverse the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the 1994 guidelines pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and direct that Curtis be present at her resentencing. See, e.g., Dougherty v. State, 785 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Roy v. State, 711 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ERVIN, BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dougherty v. State
785 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Roy v. State
711 So. 2d 1348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
827 So. 2d 361, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14299, 2002 WL 31202136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.