Curtis v. State
827 So. 2d 361, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14299, 2002 WL 31202136
Opinion
Appellant, Andrena M. Curtis, challenges her resentencing conducted by the trial court outside of her presence. We reverse the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the 1994 guidelines pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and direct that Curtis be present at her resentencing. See, e.g., Dougherty v. State, 785 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Roy v. State, 711 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis v. State, 827 So. 2d 361, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14299, 2002 WL 31202136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
827 So. 2d 361 (Curtis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dougherty v. State
785 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Roy v. State
711 So. 2d 1348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)