Curtis v. Chiles

594 So. 2d 858, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1873, 1992 WL 37154
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1561
StatusPublished

This text of 594 So. 2d 858 (Curtis v. Chiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. Chiles, 594 So. 2d 858, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1873, 1992 WL 37154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, because the grounds for relief asserted in the petition should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See State v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990); Mack v. State, 586 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Washington v. State, 576 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
569 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hickman v. State
581 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
MacK v. State
586 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Washington v. State
576 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 858, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1873, 1992 WL 37154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-chiles-fladistctapp-1992.