Curtis v. Chiles
This text of 594 So. 2d 858 (Curtis v. Chiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, because the grounds for relief asserted in the petition should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See State v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990); Mack v. State, 586 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Washington v. State, 576 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 So. 2d 858, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1873, 1992 WL 37154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-chiles-fladistctapp-1992.