Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mack v. State

580 So. 2d 294, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5772, 1991 WL 85554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 1991

DocketNo. 90-02460

StatusPublished

This text of 580 So. 2d 294 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 580 So. 2d 294, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5772, 1991 WL 85554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

The appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for grand theft of a firearm. The record reflects, however, that the appellant, who was representing himself, voluntarily absented himself from the trial court proceedings without leave of court. Consequently, the trial continued without him. Since no objections or motions relative to the sufficiency of the evidence were interposed until the case was appealed, the appellant cannot now raise the issue for review. See Mancini v. State, 273 So.2d 371 (Fla.1983), and Sanderson v. State, 390 So.2d 744 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft of a firearm are affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

The appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for grand theft of a firearm. The record reflects, however, that the appellant, who was representing himself, voluntarily absented himself from the trial court proceedings without leave of court. Consequently, the trial continued without him. Since no objections or motions relative to the sufficiency of the evidence were interposed until the case was appealed, the appellant cannot now raise the issue for review. See Mancini v. State, 273 So.2d 371 (Fla.1983), and Sanderson v. State, 390 So.2d 744 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft of a firearm are affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 So. 2d 294, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5772, 1991 WL 85554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack