Curtis, Lydia L. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 16, 2013·No. 05-12-00032-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered April 16, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00032-CR

LYDIA L. CURTIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-82230-08

ORDER Appellant has informed the Court that she wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders

brief filed by appellate counsel and has requested an extension of time to do so. The order issued

on March 19, 2013 inadvertently identified Doris Berry as appellant’s attorney. Courtney Miller

is actually appellant’s attorney at the time.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel Courtney Miller to provide appellant with

copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. We further ORDER Ms. Miller to provide this

Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record

has been sent to appellant.

We ORDER appellant to file her pro se response by JULY 22, 2013. We DENY appellant’s April 4, 2013 pro se “motion to remove Courtney Miller.”

Counsel’s removal is not necessary at this time. Appellant is being provided the record and is

entitled to respond to the Anders brief filed by counsel.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Honorable Mark Rusch, Presiding Judge, 401st Judicial District Court, and to Courtney Miller.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Lydia Curtis,

Collin County Detention Facility, 4300 Community Avenue, McKinney, Texas 75071.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis, Lydia L. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Curtis, Lydia L. v. State (Curtis, Lydia L. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.