Curtis, Lydia L. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 8, 2012·No. 05-12-00032-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 8, 2012

In The ourt of tl eaI ifab i tritt of at No. 05-12-00032-CR

LYDIA L. CURTIS, Appellant

Vo

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Coilin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-82230-08

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s October 26, 2012 pro se motion r:equest~ng a new trial.

Appellant is represented by counsel. Appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd

v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis, Lydia L. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Curtis, Lydia L. v. State (Curtis, Lydia L. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)