Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Curry v. State

Curry v. State

819 So. 2d 1007, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9181, 2002 WL 1389840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 811 So. 2d 736 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2002·No. No. 5D02-1685·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bonilla v. State, 766 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding an appellant is not entitled to an automatic resentencing under the 1994 guidelines because the original sentencing was the result of a written plea agreement).

THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curry v. State, 819 So. 2d 1007, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9181, 2002 WL 1389840 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

819 So. 2d 1007 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonilla v. State
766 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)