Curry v. State
568 So. 2d 1346, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8601, 1990 WL 175054
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1990·No. No. 90-2392·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. State, 568 So. 2d 1346, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8601, 1990 WL 175054 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
568 So. 2d 1346 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
574 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)