Cobb v. State
567 So. 2d 554, 1990 WL 146811
Opinion
Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*555 David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES.
SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cobb v. State, 567 So. 2d 554, 1990 WL 146811 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
567 So. 2d 554 (Cobb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
574 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hall v. State
568 So. 2d 1346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Curry v. State
568 So. 2d 1346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bush v. State
568 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)