Curcio v. Grossman
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ijt: SALE RONECAE DY pipes | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Le SOE? nana enna nnn nance nnn nn K ile seme orp pen Sle bane □ ROSANNA CURCIO, aha SIN Joo2e Plaintiff, -against- 22 CIVIL 1648 (VB) JUDGMENT COUNTY OF PUTNAM JUDGE VICTOR GROSSMAN; DONNA E. ABRAMS; LAURA ROBERTS; COUNTY OF PUTNAM, Defendants. eee □□□ □□□ XK
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 14, 2022, this action is DISMISSED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case. Dated: New York, New York March 14, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: AM Aro Deputy Cler
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curcio v. Grossman (Curcio v. Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.