Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

19 S.W. 822, 110 Mo. 208, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 62
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided May 31, 1892·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Thomas, J.

This was an action instituted in the-circuit court of Jackson county to recover damages for personal injuries. A trial was had before a jury, and at the.close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court held that on the pleadings and evidence the plaintiff could not recover. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. The appellant has failed to file an. abstract of the pleadings setting forth the grounds upon which he asks damages in compliance with rules 11, 12 and 13 of this court, and section 2301, Revised Statutes, 1889, and such abstract being necessary to be consulted in the determination of the assigned errors in. this cause the appeal is dismissed. Snyder v. Free, 102 Mo. 325; Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180; Craig v. Scudder, 98 Mo. 664.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co., 19 S.W. 822, 110 Mo. 208, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 62 (Mo. 1892).

19 S.W. 822 (Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. Parrish
270 S.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1925)
Herman Savings Bank v. Kropp
181 S.W. 86 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Childers v. Hurwitz
127 S.W. 933 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Ott v. Spiker
127 S.W. 945 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Murrell v. McGuigan
49 S.W. 984 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)