Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

19 S.W. 822, 110 Mo. 208, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 62
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 31, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 S.W. 822 (Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co., 19 S.W. 822, 110 Mo. 208, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 62 (Mo. 1892).

Opinion

Thomas, J.

This was an action instituted in the-circuit court of Jackson county to recover damages for personal injuries. A trial was had before a jury, and at the.close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court held that on the pleadings and evidence the plaintiff could not recover. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. The appellant has failed to file an. abstract of the pleadings setting forth the grounds upon which he asks damages in compliance with rules 11, 12 and 13 of this court, and section 2301, Revised Statutes, 1889, and such abstract being necessary to be consulted in the determination of the assigned errors in. this cause the appeal is dismissed. Snyder v. Free, 102 Mo. 325; Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180; Craig v. Scudder, 98 Mo. 664.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. Parrish
270 S.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1925)
Herman Savings Bank v. Kropp
181 S.W. 86 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Childers v. Hurwitz
127 S.W. 933 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Ott v. Spiker
127 S.W. 945 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Murrell v. McGuigan
49 S.W. 984 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 S.W. 822, 110 Mo. 208, 1892 Mo. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-union-pacific-railway-co-mo-1892.