Childers v. Hurwitz

127 S.W. 933, 144 Mo. App. 216, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 345
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 1910·Published

Opinion

NIXON, P. J.

This is an appeal on the short form from the circuit court of Jasper county. Nothing appears to have been filed in this court but a certified copy of the record entry of the judgment and order granting the appeal. A printed abstract is required by our rules and section 813, Revised Statutes 1899, and as none has been furnished, the appeal will be dismissed. [Dean v. [217]*217Brockman, 128 Mo. App. 77, 106 S. W. 592; Garrett v. K. C. Coal Min. Co., 111 Mo. 1. c. 281, 20 S. W. 25; Cunningham v. Union Pac. Ry. Co., 110 Mo. 208, 19 S. W. 822; Whiting v. Lead Co., 195 Mo. 509, 92 S. W. 883.]

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Childers v. Hurwitz, 127 S.W. 933, 144 Mo. App. 216, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 345 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910).

127 S.W. 933 (Childers v. Hurwitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
19 S.W. 822 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Rothenbarger v. Rothenbarger
19 S.W. 932 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Garrett v. Kansas City Coal Mining Co.
20 S.W. 25 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Whiting v. Big River Lead Co.
92 S.W. 883 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Dean & Ratcliffe v. Brockman
106 S.W. 592 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)