Cunningham v. State

269 S.W. 1114, 99 Tex. Crim. 326

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Tex. Crim. 624 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1925·No. No. 9225.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge

Appellant was convicted in the district court of McLennan County of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment correctly charges the burglary of a box car, and the charge of the court submits the law applicable.-

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge

Appellant was convicted in the district court of McLennan County of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment correctly charges the burglary of a box car, and the charge of the court submits the law applicable.-

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cunningham v. State, 269 S.W. 1114, 99 Tex. Crim. 326 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

269 S.W. 1114 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.