Cunningham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cunningham v. State

269 S.W. 1114, 99 Tex. Crim. 327, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 139

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Tex. Crim. 624 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1925·No. No. 9224.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of McLennan County of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment correctly charges the burglary of a box car, and the charge of the court submits the law applicable.

No error appearing, the judgment will be afiirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of McLennan County of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment correctly charges the burglary of a box car, and the charge of the court submits the law applicable.

No error appearing, the judgment will be afiirmed.

Cunningham v. State, 269 S.W. 1114, 99 Tex. Crim. 327, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 139 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

269 S.W. 1114 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.