Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State

735 So. 2d 504, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1999 WL 22385
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 677 So. 2d 929 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1999·No. No. 98-1912·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Cunningham (Cunningham) seeks review of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial judge correctly determined that Cunningham’s double jeopardy claim was without merit and we affirm on this issue.

We also treat the instant motion as a petition for a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). However, finding that it is not facially sufficient, we deny Cunningham’s petition for a belated appeal.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, jj.; CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. State, 735 So. 2d 504, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1999 WL 22385 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

735 So. 2d 504 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.