Cunningham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cunningham v. State

735 So. 2d 504, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1999 WL 22385

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1912

StatusPublished

This text of 735 So. 2d 504 (Cunningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. State, 735 So. 2d 504, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1999 WL 22385 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Cunningham (Cunningham) seeks review of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial judge correctly determined that Cunningham’s double jeopardy claim was without merit and we affirm on this issue.

We also treat the instant motion as a petition for a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). However, finding that it is not facially sufficient, we deny Cunningham’s petition for a belated appeal.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, jj.; CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Cunningham (Cunningham) seeks review of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial judge correctly determined that Cunningham’s double jeopardy claim was without merit and we affirm on this issue.

We also treat the instant motion as a petition for a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). However, finding that it is not facially sufficient, we deny Cunningham’s petition for a belated appeal.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, jj.; CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 So. 2d 504, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1999 WL 22385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.