Cunningham v. Blake
121 Mass. 333, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 374
Opinion
The testator, by the language which he used, has not so clearly manifested an intention that his widow should take an estate in fee, or an absolute power of disposal, that this court, sitting in equity, can declare that she can make a clear title which the defendant should be specifically compelled to accept, and thereby to assume the risk of litigation with the testator’s children, who are not parties to this suit, Jeffries v. Jeffries, 117 Mass. 184. Bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. Blake, 121 Mass. 333, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 374 (Mass. 1876).
121 Mass. 333 (Cunningham v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. MacAlister
294 N.E.2d 441 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1972)
Nicholson v. Whyte
236 S.W. 770 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
McCaffrey v. Little
20 App. D.C. 116 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1902)
Spencer v. Sandusky
33 S.E. 221 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1899)
Cushing v. Spalding
41 N.E. 297 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Hunting v. Damon
35 N.E. 1064 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Commercial National Bank
14 R.I. 625 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Butts v. Andrews
136 Mass. 221 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)