Butts v. Andrews

136 Mass. 221, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 65
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 2, 1884·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

The plaintiff’s title depends on the construction to be given to the peculiar phraseology of the will; and even if we were inclined to the opinion that he took an estate in fee, still the title is not so clear that the defendant ought to be specifically compelled to accept it, and thus to assume the risk of subsequent litigation with persons not now before the court. The case falls within the decision in Cunningham v. Blake, 121 Mass. 333. See also Jeffries v. Jeffries, 117 Mass. 184; Hayes v. Harmony Grove Cemetery, 108 Mass. 400; Pyrke v. Waddingham, 10 Hare, 1; 1 Story Eq. Jur. § 749.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butts v. Andrews, 136 Mass. 221, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 65 (Mass. 1884).

136 Mass. 221 (Butts v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. MacAlister
294 N.E.2d 441 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1972)
Nicholson v. Whyte
236 S.W. 770 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Crowley v. O'Neil
271 F. 379 (D.C. Circuit, 1921)
Woodbridge v. Jones
1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 103 (Massachusetts Land Court, 1902)
McCaffrey v. Little
20 App. D.C. 116 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1902)
Griffith v. Maxfield
39 S.W. 852 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1897)
Gates v. Parmly
66 N.W. 253 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Cushing v. Spalding
41 N.E. 297 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
American Security & Trust Co. v. Muse
4 App. D.C. 12 (D.C. Circuit, 1894)
Hunting v. Damon
35 N.E. 1064 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Chesman v. Cummings
7 N.E. 13 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Noyes v. Johnson
31 N.E. 767 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)