Cummings v. State

71 So. 3d 922, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15859, 2011 WL 5108458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cummings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10559
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 2011·No. No. 5D11-242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed upon the appellant, Misty Janette Cummings, in all respects except one. The sentencing transcript indicates that the trial court imposed a $15 cost for the alcohol-drug trust fund. On the judgment and sentence form, however, the box for the $151 rape crisis trust fund was checked in error, and the box for the alcohol-drug trust fund is mistakenly left unchecked. Thus, we remand for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. State, 71 So. 3d 922, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15859, 2011 WL 5108458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

71 So. 3d 922 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.