Cummings v. State

6 So. 3d 715, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 937149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cummings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2009·No. 5D09-123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to preclude the trial court from proceeding to trial in his case, contending that he is entitled to discharge pursuant to the speedy trial rule. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191.

This Court cannot review by prohibition the speedy trial issue until the trial court has denied a motion for discharge. The order denying discharge should be included in an appendix attached to the petition. Accordingly, we deny the petition for prohibition without prejudice to file a motion for discharge in the circuit court. Barstad v. State, 925 So.2d 1135, 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

PETITION DENIED.

TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. State, 6 So. 3d 715, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 937149 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

6 So. 3d 715 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barstad v. State
925 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)