Cummings v. State
882 So. 2d 439, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12844, 2004 WL 2072970
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cummings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151 →
Opinion
Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)(holding that there is no authority for a motion for rehearing of an order disposing of a rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence and, therefore, the motion for rehearing did not postpone rendition of the order so as to make the notice of appeal timely).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. State, 882 So. 2d 439, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12844, 2004 WL 2072970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
882 So. 2d 439 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)