Cummings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cummings v. State

838 So. 2d 1226, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2887, 2003 WL 827578

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 7, 2003

DocketNo. 2D03-193

StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 1226 (Cummings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. State, 838 So. 2d 1226, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2887, 2003 WL 827578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Cummings appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Cummings might have to file a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, COVINGTON, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Cummings appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Cummings might have to file a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, COVINGTON, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 So. 2d 1226, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2887, 2003 WL 827578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.