Cummings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cummings v. State

838 So. 2d 1226, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2887, 2003 WL 827578

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cummings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16939 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2003·No. No. 2D03-193·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Cummings appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Cummings might have to file a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, COVINGTON, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Cummings appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Cummings might have to file a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, COVINGTON, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cummings v. State, 838 So. 2d 1226, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2887, 2003 WL 827578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

838 So. 2d 1226 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.