Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad

137 N.Y.S. 1116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D. 105

Opinion

No opinion.' Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements,, without passing upon the sufficiency of the defense of the statute of limitations. See, also,' 136 N. Y. Supp. 1134.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad, 137 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

137 N.Y.S. 1116 (Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.