Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad
152 A.D. 907
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D. 105 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1912·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without passing upon the sufficiency of the defense of the Statute of Limitations. No opinion. Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad, 152 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
152 A.D. 907 (Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.