Cumberland Bank & Trust Co. v. French

41 S.E.2d 499, 186 Va. 53, 1947 Va. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedMarch 3, 1947
DocketRecord No. 3150
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 41 S.E.2d 499 (Cumberland Bank & Trust Co. v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cumberland Bank & Trust Co. v. French, 41 S.E.2d 499, 186 Va. 53, 1947 Va. LEXIS 127 (Va. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Cumberland Bank & Trust Company, Inc., one of appellants, is a banking institution, the charter of which permits cumulative voting. The appellee, G. Mark French, contends that at the annual meeting of stockholders held January 25, 1946, he was elected a director for 1946. He filed his petition for a writ of mandamus against the bank and the other appellants, who claim to have been elected directors at the same meeting, to compel them to admit him as a director for the year 1946. The appellants demurred to the petition and filed their answer. The answer averred that as a result of the voting the nine individual appellants were elected as directors and that the appellee was not elected.

The court entered an order overruling the demurrer, holding that a case for mandamus had not been made, but that under sections 3803 and 3804 of the Code it had summary [54]*54power. It thereupon determined that the appellee had been elected as one of nine directors for the year 1946, and ordered the board of directors to determine by lot at its next meeting which of two named directors should vacate his position to make room for appellee, or make such other arrangement as the bank might determine necessary, so the appellee would be retained as a director.

The case was argued on January 8, 1947. The period for which the directors were elected has now expired, and the time for another annual meeting of stockholders to elect directors has heretofore arrived. The controversy from which this litigation developed has therefore ceased to exist, and no relief could now be granted. Consequently, the case is dismissed without costs to either party. Hankins v. Virginia Beach, 182 Va. 642, 29 S. E. (2d) 831.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godlove v. Rothstein
Supreme Court of Virginia, 2022
Richard Hill v.Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2021
Hallmark Personnel Agency, Inc. v. Jones
154 S.E.2d 5 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E.2d 499, 186 Va. 53, 1947 Va. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberland-bank-trust-co-v-french-va-1947.