Culver v. State
This text of 583 So. 2d 1356 (Culver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On remand, the circuit court entered a written order containing the following findings of fact “which are based on the evidence adduced at the defendant’s Rule 20 hearing:
“1. Counsel effectively represented the defendant.
“2. The defendant failed to substantiate his claim of newly discovered evidence.
“3. The sentence imposed fell within the legal range.
“4. The Court fully protected the defendant’s constitutional rights.
“Based on these findings of fact, I deny Rule 20 relief.”
Although given additional time to file a brief on return to remand, the appellant has failed to file a brief. Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court denying the petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed for the reasons stated in the order of the circuit court dated November 2, 1990.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 So. 2d 1356, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1161, 1991 WL 119373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culver-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.