Culver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Culver v. State

578 So. 2d 1381, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1687, 1990 WL 210543

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedOctober 26, 1990

DocketCR 89-1239

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 1381 (Culver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culver v. State, 578 So. 2d 1381, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1687, 1990 WL 210543 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner challenges his 1987 convictions for first degree robbery and first degree theft.

The circuit court denied the petition after an evidentiary hearing. However, the court failed to “make specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented” as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. Smith v. State, 563 So.2d 61 (Ala.Cr.App.1990).

Therefore, this cause is remanded to the circuit court with instructions that the court enter the specific findings of fact required by Rule 20.9(d). The circuit court [1382]*1382shall forward its order containing those findings and conclusions to this Court within 30 days. A copy of that order shall be served on the district attorney and the appellant’s counsel. The appellant shall have 14 days from the filing of the order of the circuit court in this Court to file his brief. The appellee shall have 14 days from the filing of the appellant’s brief to file a reply brief.

This Court specifically rejects the State’s contention that the appellant has waived this issue on appeal by failing to cite legal authority in support of his argument.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner challenges his 1987 convictions for first degree robbery and first degree theft.

The circuit court denied the petition after an evidentiary hearing. However, the court failed to “make specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented” as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. Smith v. State, 563 So.2d 61 (Ala.Cr.App.1990).

Therefore, this cause is remanded to the circuit court with instructions that the court enter the specific findings of fact required by Rule 20.9(d). The circuit court [1382]*1382shall forward its order containing those findings and conclusions to this Court within 30 days. A copy of that order shall be served on the district attorney and the appellant’s counsel. The appellant shall have 14 days from the filing of the order of the circuit court in this Court to file his brief. The appellee shall have 14 days from the filing of the appellant’s brief to file a reply brief.

This Court specifically rejects the State’s contention that the appellant has waived this issue on appeal by failing to cite legal authority in support of his argument.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 1381, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1687, 1990 WL 210543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culver-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack