Cullen v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
21 N.E. 1115, 113 N.Y. 667, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1051
Opinion
reads for reversal of order of General Term and for affirmance of judgment.
All concur, except Danforth, J., dissenting, and Peckham, J., not voting.
Order reversed and judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cullen v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co., 21 N.E. 1115, 113 N.Y. 667, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1051 (N.Y. 1889).
21 N.E. 1115 (Cullen v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robison v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co.
184 S.E. 96 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)
Askey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
162 N.W. 647 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1917)
Ward v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
78 A.D. 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Lewin v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
52 A.D. 69 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Jencks v. Lehigh Val. Railroad
53 N.Y.S. 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
McQuade v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
17 Misc. 154 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Collins v. New York, C. & St. L. Railroad
36 N.Y.S. 942 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Goodall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
35 N.Y.S. 544 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Miller v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad
31 N.Y.S. 317 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Railway Co. v. Cullen
16 S.W. 169 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1891)
Redmond v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad
10 N.Y.S. 330 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)