Cucuzza v. Vaccaro
This text of 492 N.E.2d 785 (Cucuzza v. Vaccaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Charles B. Lawrence at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 101). (See also, Duffy v Horton Mem. Hosp., 66 NY2d 473). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, [828]*828Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 N.E.2d 785, 67 N.Y.2d 825, 501 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cucuzza-v-vaccaro-ny-1986.