Becker v. Elota Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Becker v. Elota Realty Co.

123 A.D.2d 590, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 590 (Becker v. Elota Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Becker v. Elota Realty Co., 123 A.D.2d 590, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.), dated October 24, 1985, as, upon reargument, denied their motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint naming the third-party defendant Times Square Stores Corporation as a prime defendant.

Order reversed, with costs payable by the respondent, and [591]*591motion granted (see, Cucuzza v Vaccaro, 109 AD2d 101, ajfd 67 NY2d 825; Holst v Edinger, 93 AD2d 313, 316). The plaintiffs shall serve their amended complaint within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.), dated October 24, 1985, as, upon reargument, denied their motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint naming the third-party defendant Times Square Stores Corporation as a prime defendant.

Order reversed, with costs payable by the respondent, and [591]*591motion granted (see, Cucuzza v Vaccaro, 109 AD2d 101, ajfd 67 NY2d 825; Holst v Edinger, 93 AD2d 313, 316). The plaintiffs shall serve their amended complaint within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 590, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-elota-realty-co-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack