Ctrl PA Rad. Oncology v. Good Samaritan Hospital
This text of Ctrl PA Rad. Oncology v. Good Samaritan Hospital (Ctrl PA Rad. Oncology v. Good Samaritan Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J-S38015-20
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, P.C., A : PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION : : Appellant : : : v. : : No. 306 MDA 2020 : THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL : OF LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA, A : PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, : WELLSPAN HEALTH, A : PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, AND : ROBERT LONGO, AN ADULT : INDIVIDUAL :
Appeal from the Order Entered January 30, 2020, In the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County, Civil Division at No(s): 2015-02124.
BEFORE: KUNSELMAN, J., McLAUGHLIN, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E.*
JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 04, 2020
Central Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology, P.C., (“CPRO”) appeals from
an order granting summary judgment in this lawsuit concerning the corporate
affairs of Good Samaritan Hospital; WellSpan Health; and Robert Longo, an
executive officer of those two nonprofits. We transfer this case due to our
lack of appellate jurisdiction over this subject matter.
Because the appellees have not contested this Court’s jurisdiction, “the
appeal is perfected, and we have discretion to retain jurisdiction.” Trumbull
Corp. v. Boss Constr., Inc., 747 A.2d 395, 398–99 (Pa. Super. 2000); see ____________________________________________
* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court. J-S38015-20
also 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 704(a). However, we “may, sua sponte, raise the issue
of whether an appeal should be transferred to the Commonwealth Court.”
Smith v. Ivy Lee Real Estate, LLC, 152 A.3d 1062, 1065 (Pa. Super. 2016).
“[I]n deciding whether this Court has appellate jurisdiction, we must
consider all of the potential issues underlying the parties’ theories of the case.
If any potential substantive issue (or participation of a particular party)
invokes the Commonwealth Court’s jurisdiction, transfer is appropriate, and
we must transfer prior to reaching the merits of the appeal.” Mohn v. Bucks
County Republican Comm., 218 A.3d 927, 934 (2019) (en banc) (emphasis
in original) (“Mohn I”). In Mohn I, this Court transferred an appeal to the
Commonwealth Court, because it implicated provisions of the Election Code.
Following transfer, the Commonwealth Court noted an additional basis
for its exercise of exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction. It said:
we have [also] been conferred with appellate jurisdiction pursuant to Section 762(a)(5)(ii) of the Judicial Code, which states that this “Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas in all actions or proceedings otherwise involving the corporate affairs of any corporation not-for-profit subject to Title 15 or the affairs of the members, directors, officers, or agents thereof.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 762(a)(5)(ii). See also Comment to Section 9112 of the Pennsylvania Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Law (Nonprofit Association Law), 15 Pa. C.S. § 9112 cmt. (“This chapter applies to all nonprofit associations, whether they be classified as religious, public benefit or mutual benefit or whether they are classified as tax exempt. Therefore, the chapter covers unincorporated philanthropic, educational, scientific, social and literary clubs, unions, trade associations, and political organizations, such as political parties”).
-2- J-S38015-20
Mohn v. Bucks County Republican Comm., No. 24 C.D. 2018, 2020 WL
1079247, at *1 n.1 (Pa. Cmwlth. Mar. 6, 2020) (some punctuation omitted)
(unpublished decision) (“Mohn II”). Because the Bucks County Republican
Committee was a nonprofit association, the Commonwealth Court agreed with
our decision to transfer that appeal to it.
Here, the Good Shepherd Hospital and WellSpan Health are nonprofits,
comprising a Health System in south-central Pennsylvania. See Defendants’
Second, Amended Answer and New Matter at 1; see also WellSpan Health,
“Good Samaritan Health System Officially Joins WellSpan Health on July 1,”
June 30, 2015.1 Moreover, CPRO has alleged that the Hospital and WellSpan
formed a partnership with it and subsequently breached their fiduciary duties.
This appeal therefore directly implicates the corporate affairs of those
nonprofits’ pursuant to Title 15 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. In
fact, the Health System relies upon Title 15 to argue that no partnership arose.
See Health System’s Brief at 13. Accordingly, the Commonwealth Court has
exclusive appellate jurisdiction over the subject matter of this appeal. See 42
Pa.C.S.A. § 762(a)(5)(ii).
____________________________________________
1 Available at https://www.wellspan.org/news/story/good-samaritan-health- system-officially-joins-wellspan-health-on-july-1/15537 (last visited Aug. 10, 2020).
-3- J-S38015-20
We therefore order this appeal be TRANSFERRED to the Commonwealth
Court of Pennsylvania.
Appeal transferred.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 9/4/2020
-4- J-S38015-20
-5-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ctrl PA Rad. Oncology v. Good Samaritan Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ctrl-pa-rad-oncology-v-good-samaritan-hospital-pasuperct-2020.