C.S. v. New York City Department Of Education

S.D. New York

C.S. v. New York City Department Of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 19, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00157·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: _7/19/2023 C.S., individually and on behalf of her child, L.S., Plaintiff, . 1:23-cv-157 (MKV) -against- NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDUCATION, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 18.] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 21, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. K. Lys (/ Date: July 19, 2023 MARY VYSWOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: _7/19/2023 C.S., individually and on behalf of her child, L.S., Plaintiff, . 1:23-cv-157 (MKV) -against- NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDUCATION, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 18.] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 21, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. K. Lys (/ Date: July 19, 2023 MARY VYSWOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge

C.S. v. New York City Department Of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

C.S. v. New York City Department Of Education (C.S. v. New York City Department Of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related