C.S. v. New York City Department of Education

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #_____ DATE FILED:__7/28/2022 C.S. and C.S.1, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of their child, Y.S., Plaintiff, -against- 1:21-cv-07927-MKV NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDUCATION, NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, CHANCELLOR MEISHA PORTER, in her official capacity, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiffs informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 31]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 28, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | / ls Date: July 28, 2022 MARY RY vyakocal New York, NY United States District Judge