Cruz v. State

59 So. 3d 322, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5556, 2011 WL 1485982
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2011·No. No. 3D09-1139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Cruz appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder. We reverse the conviction on each of two independently-sufficient grounds. First, the attempted voluntary manslaughter instruction, as given to the jury, violates the holding in State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010).

Second, we find that Cruz’s second demand to represent himself was unequivocally made, necessitating a Faretta1 hearing. Rodriguez v. State, 982 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Because such a hearing was not conducted before the trial court denied Cruz’s demand, a reversal on this ground is also required.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 59 So. 3d 322, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5556, 2011 WL 1485982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

59 So. 3d 322 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herron v. State
113 So. 3d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)