Cruz v. State

971 So. 2d 949, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20497, 2007 WL 4482206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 971 So. 2d 178
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2007·No. No. 3D07-2210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of [950]*950Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Cruz alleges that he was sentenced to fifty years in prison for committing a second-degree felony, unarmed robbery, when the correct sentence should have been fifteen years in prison. The trial court summarily denied Cruz’s motion, stating that he was convicted of a first-degree felony, robbery using a deadly weapon or firearm, in violation of section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes, and thus was properly sentenced to fifty years in prison. The trial court did not attach the judgment or the sentence to the order summarily denying Cruz’s motion.

Cruz has raised a facially sufficient claim for Rule 3.800(a) relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant’s claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 971 So. 2d 949, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20497, 2007 WL 4482206 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

971 So. 2d 949 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.