Cruz v. State

890 So. 2d 1253, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 244, 2005 WL 94862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 822 So. 2d 595
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2005·No. No. 3D04-2778·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claim of defendant-appellant Felio Cruz that his sentence for robbery exceeds the legal maximum is without merit. See § 813.011, Fla. Stat. (1969) (robbery is punishable “by imprisonment in the state prison for life or any lesser term of years, at the discretion of the court.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 890 So. 2d 1253, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 244, 2005 WL 94862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

890 So. 2d 1253 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.