Cruz v. State

409 So. 2d 205, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1982·No. No. 81-2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), the petitioner has appealed from an order which, apart from correctly striking the five years probation which followed his ten year prison sentence, Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981), summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The court has required the state to respond and has considered that response and the record presented. We find that the petitioner’s contentions are either frivolous on their face or are completely refuted by the transcript of the colloquy which took place when he pled guilty to the charges in question. Since it therefore conclusively appears that the defendant is entitled to no relief, the order under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 409 So. 2d 205, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

409 So. 2d 205 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. State
417 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)