Crump v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crump v. State

329 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 92584

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 2011

DocketED 94947

StatusPublished

This text of 329 S.W.3d 410 (Crump v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crump v. State, 329 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 92584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Courtland Crump (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI