Crump v. State

329 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 92584
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crump v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2011·No. ED 94947·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Courtland Crump (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crump v. State, 329 S.W.3d 410, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 2011 WL 92584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

329 S.W.3d 410 (Crump v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. O'ROARK
329 S.W.3d 410 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)