Crump v. State
292 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316, 2009 WL 3050909
Opinion
ORDER
Donald O. Cramp appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We *606 have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crump v. State, 292 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316, 2009 WL 3050909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
292 S.W.3d 605 (Crump v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hollins v. State
292 S.W.3d 605 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)