Crump v. State
This text of Crump v. State (Crump v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BENJAMIN CRUMP, § § No. 2, 2018 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the § State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 84001366DI (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 18, 2018 Decided: August 7, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
Having considered the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm,
and the record on appeal from the Superior Court’s decision denying the appellant’s
second motion for postconviction relief and granting his counsel’s motion to
withdraw, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the
basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned decision dated December 14, 2017.*
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
* State v. Crump, 2017 WL 6403510 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 14, 2017).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crump v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crump-v-state-del-2018.