Crummie v. State
This text of 204 So. 2d 913 (Crummie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and sentence imposed upon him pursuant to a non-jury trial and his conviction of the crime of robbery. Defendant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial judge’s verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery is supported by sufficient competent evidence.
We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Solomon v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 492.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 So. 2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crummie-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.