Crummie v. State

204 So. 2d 913
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1967
DocketNo. 67-30
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 So. 2d 913 (Crummie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crummie v. State, 204 So. 2d 913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and sentence imposed upon him pursuant to a non-jury trial and his conviction of the crime of robbery. Defendant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial judge’s verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery is supported by sufficient competent evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Solomon v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 492.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cappetta v. State
204 So. 2d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 So. 2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crummie-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.