Crummie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crummie v. State

204 So. 2d 913

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1967·No. No. 67-30·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and sentence imposed upon him pursuant to a non-jury trial and his conviction of the crime of robbery. Defendant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial judge’s verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery is supported by sufficient competent evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Solomon v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 492.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and sentence imposed upon him pursuant to a non-jury trial and his conviction of the crime of robbery. Defendant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial judge’s verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery is supported by sufficient competent evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Solomon v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 492.

Affirmed.

Crummie v. State, 204 So. 2d 913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

204 So. 2d 913 (Crummie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related