Crummie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crummie v. State

172 So. 2d 480, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 1965

DocketNo. 64-674

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 480 (Crummie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crummie v. State, 172 So. 2d 480, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his motion for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924 Appendix. In denying the motion the trial Judge found and recited “that the movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing [at the trial] in this cause and also the petition does not state grounds for relief.” We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and the briefs, and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Leach v. State, Fla.1961, 132 So.2d 329; Milton v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 137; Gore v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 37; Hoffman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 38.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his motion for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924 Appendix. In denying the motion the trial Judge found and recited “that the movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing [at the trial] in this cause and also the petition does not state grounds for relief.” We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and the briefs, and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Leach v. State, Fla.1961, 132 So.2d 329; Milton v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 137; Gore v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 37; Hoffman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 38.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 480, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crummie-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack