Cruller v. State
This text of 745 So. 2d 512 (Cruller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James CRULLER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and M. Rebecca Springer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit in the defendant's contentions on appeal, we affirm his convictions and sentences for robbery without a firearm in violation of section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1995) and carjacking without a firearm in violation of section 812.133, Florida Statutes (1995).
Defendant and an accomplice robbed the victim in this case after following him home. While his accomplice pointed a gun at the victim's head and demanded his car keys, defendant took the victim's wallet out of his pocket. Both assailants then drove off in the stolen car. As in Smart v. State, 652 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), we find that under these circumstances the defendant was properly convicted for both of the separate offenses of robbery and carjacking. Nevertheless, because our decision conflicts with Ward v. State, 730 So.2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), we certify our conflict with the majority's decision in that case.
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
745 So. 2d 512, 1999 WL 1062243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruller-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.