Cruger v. . Douglass

New York Court of Appeals

Cruger v. . Douglass

2 N.Y. 571, 4 How. Pr. 215

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1850

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 N.Y. 571 (Cruger v. . Douglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cruger v. . Douglass, 2 N.Y. 571, 4 How. Pr. 215 (N.Y. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, Ch. J.

The decree appealed from settles all the leading points in controversy between the parties, but it directs a reference for the purpose of ascertaining what real and personal estate falls within the operation of the decree; and directs "the referee to take and state an account between the parties. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, the amount found due to either party is to be paid by the other, “ at such time or times as shall be specified in said report;” and the sum of five thousand dollars is to be forthwith paid to the respondent, on account of the moneys which may be payable to him under the order or decree. The referee is to make his report with all convenient speed, “ to the end, that on the coming in and confirmation of his report, such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It is also ordered, that neither party shall have costs as against the other; “ and that all further directions be reserved until the coming in of the said referee’s report.” Although the decree is final as to several particu *572 lars, it evidently is not so as to all. “Further directions” are reserved until the coming in of the report; and then “such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It will be necessary to set the cause down for a further decree on the coming in of the report. The decree already made is not final; and the appeal was premature. The point was decided in Harris v Clark at the last July term."

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, Ch. J.

The decree appealed from settles all the leading points in controversy between the parties, but it directs a reference for the purpose of ascertaining what real and personal estate falls within the operation of the decree; and directs "the referee to take and state an account between the parties. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, the amount found due to either party is to be paid by the other, “ at such time or times as shall be specified in said report;” and the sum of five thousand dollars is to be forthwith paid to the respondent, on account of the moneys which may be payable to him under the order or decree. The referee is to make his report with all convenient speed, “ to the end, that on the coming in and confirmation of his report, such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It is also ordered, that neither party shall have costs as against the other; “ and that all further directions be reserved until the coming in of the said referee’s report.” Although the decree is final as to several particu *572 lars, it evidently is not so as to all. “Further directions” are reserved until the coming in of the report; and then “such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just.” It will be necessary to set the cause down for a further decree on the coming in of the report. The decree already made is not final; and the appeal was premature. The point was decided in Harris v Clark at the last July term."

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.Y. 571, 4 How. Pr. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruger-v-douglass-ny-1850.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack