Beebe v. . Griffing
6 N.Y. 465
Opinion
THE COURT decided that the statute did not authorize the appeal in that stage of the cause. That it should have been delayed until after the entry of judgment making partition, when both the intermediate order and the judgment would have been open for review. (See Code, §§ 11, 245, 333; Cruger v. Douglass, 2Comst. 571.) *Page 466
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beebe v. . Griffing, 6 N.Y. 465 (N.Y. 1852).
6 N.Y. 465 (Beebe v. . Griffing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kingston v. Kingston
102 N.W. 577 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)
Camp Phosphate Co. v. Anderson
48 Fla. 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Bolles v. Duff
55 Barb. 580 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)