Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Commissioner

6 B.T.A. 826, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3393
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided April 14, 1927·No. Docket No. 366.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[827] opinion.

Green :

The petitionee has established its right to a deduction for repairs in the sum of-$250.

The evidence in support of the obsolescence deduction proved only that in 1919 the petitioner ascertained the run-down condition of the elevator head house and demolished and rebuilt it. Undoubtedly the petitioner is entitled to deduct as a loss the actual loss thus sustained. We have found that $2,000 is to be treated as the cost of the head house but there is no evidence whatever as to the amount of depreciation sustained thereon from the date of its acquisition to the date of its demolition. Without proof of the depreciated cost the loss can not be computed.

Judgment will he entered after 15 days' notice, under Bule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Commissioner, 6 B.T.A. 826, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3393 (bta 1927).

6 B.T.A. 826 (Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orlando Three, Inc. v. Commissioner
1983 T.C. Memo. 79 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Commissioner
6 B.T.A. 826 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)