Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Crowe v. Owens Corning Fiberglas

Crowe v. Owens Corning Fiberglas

718 N.E.2d 923, 87 Ohio St. 3d 204
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1999·No. No. 98-2507·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451, 715 N.E.2d 1062, and the jury verdict is reinstated.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crowe v. Owens Corning Fiberglas, 718 N.E.2d 923, 87 Ohio St. 3d 204 (Ohio 1999).

718 N.E.2d 923 (Crowe v. Owens Corning Fiberglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crowe v. Owens Corning Fiberglas.
1999 Ohio 16 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)