Crowder v. State
This text of 491 S.E.2d 323 (Crowder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury convicted Marcus Crowder of felony murder, two counts of aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in the shooting death of Cleophus Ammons.1 The state sought the death penalty and the jury returned [518]*518a sentence of life without parole. On appeal, Crowder raises numerous issues, including a challenge to victim impact testimony. Because the victim impact evidence was not unduly prejudicial and the other issues contain no harmful error, we affirm.
The evidence at trial showed that Crowder, Marvin Turner,* 2 and Martin Boyer decided to rob the Super Valu Grocery Store in Clarkston. After one failed attempt at kidnapping Ammons, who was the store manager, they arranged for Turner’s girl friend to lure Ammons to a place where he could be ambushed and kidnapped. They kidnapped him and took him to Turner’s apartment where they beat him and tortured him. They demanded that he give them the security code and safe combination, which Ammons did. While Crowder held Ammons at the apartment, Turner and Boyer went to the store, but were unable to open the safe. Upon their return to the apartment, Crowder and Turner decided to kill Ammons. They called Darian Tant, who they knew would lead them to a place to dispose of the body. Crowder, Turner, and Tant drove Ammons to a deserted cemetery in Rockdale County. Crowder shot Ammons in the back of the head, then Tant and Turner also shot him. Later, Crowder and Turner robbed the Super Valu store with the assistance of Tyrone Jones, who had been promoted to assistant manager after Ammons’ murder.
1. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Crowder guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt.3
2. Crowder challenges the admission of victim impact evidence from the victim’s mother and sister. This evidence was given in the same manner as approved by this Court in Turner v. State.
3. During the sentencing phase, Crowder sought to introduce into evidence a certified copy of the sentence Turner received. [519]*519Crowder contends that the fact that Turner received a sentence of life without parole was relevant mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase. Under Georgia’s statutory death-penalty scheme, any evidence that relates to the defendant’s character, prior record, or the circumstances of the offense is admissible as mitigating evidence.5 While this is a broad standard, we are not persuaded at this time that a certified copy of a co-defendant’s life sentence is a mitigating circumstance for the jury to consider.6 Even if it were error to exclude this evidence, there was no prejudice because Crowder also received a sentence of life without parole.
[519]*5194. The state used a peremptory strike to remove one of four black jurors on the panel. In response to Crowder’s Batson7 challenge, the state said it struck the juror because of her prior negative experience with law enforcement officers. The state also struck a white male who expressed similar experiences with police. The trial court did not err in finding that this was a sufficient race-neutral reason and in overruling the Batson motion.
5. We have reviewed Crowder’s remaining enumerations of error and find that they contain no error requiring reversal.8
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 S.E.2d 323, 268 Ga. 517, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 3515, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crowder-v-state-ga-1997.